ISoP Mid-Year Symposium Uppsala 2025 Handouts

All presentations provided as PDF files are protected by copyright. Printing and storage are for scholarly research, educational and personal use only. Any copyright or other notices or disclaimers must not be removed, obscured, or modified. If used for training, the source must be properly credited. Copying and making copies of the PDF presentations and videos (including through e-mail) are not permitted. The PDF files (and videos if any) must not be posted on an open-access website.

Day 1 – Wednesday, May 14

Session 1A – Information needed to support regulatory decision-making

Session 1B – Who knows best? Patient perspectives on pharmacovigilance

Session 1C – The clinicians view – Leveraging safety insights for an efficient and effective healthcare system

Session 2A – Understanding human factors in the reporting of adverse drug reaction in Sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from Uganda

Session 2B – Safeguarding patients in the Artificial Intelligence era: Ethics at the forefront of Pharmacovigilance

Session 3A – Enhancing Data Accuracy in Pharmacovigilance: Real-Time Collection of Information on Medication Errors and Herbal Adverse Events

Session 3B – Capturing more precise information on medicinal products

Session 3C – Abstract presentation: #13 Strengthening signal detection with targeted search for additional cases in Electronic Health Records using text-miningThe EHR-AE search method

Session 3D – Abstract presentation: #43 Proof-of-Concept for Improved Capture of Dose Information Supporting Safer Use of Medicines

Session 4A – Information needed to assess adverse events associated with pregnancy

Session 4B – Advanced Therapies – Challenges and Opportunities for Pharmacovigilance

Session 4C – Abstract presentation: #50 ADR Signal Extraction from Public Swedish Discussions and Social Media Data on AntiObesity Medications: An NLP-Based Approach

Session 4D – Abstract presentation: #39 Differences in the use of free text narrative among Norwegian health professional and patients. A comparative analysis of duplicate reports